论文部分内容阅读
虽说内圣外王是程朱理学乃至陆王心学的整体追求,但程朱理学特别是陆王心学确是偏重心性内圣之学,在工夫论上更是偏重简易工夫。船山作为宋明道学的批判反思者,对于这种偏病有深刻的认知和修正。本文即以船山《孟子》诠释为例,通过船山对朱子及其后学和陆王心学偏病的批判,揭示船山《孟子》诠释的政治哲学取向和工夫论上的“学修”内外兼顾立场。
Although the holy king is the pursuit of Cheng Zhu Neo-Confucianism and even the king of the heart, but Cheng Zhu Neo-Confucianism in particular is the emphasis on the heart of the saints of learning, in the work of the theory is more emphasis on easy work. Chuanshan, as a critical reflection of Song and Taoism, has profound cognition and revision of this sickness. This paper takes Chuanshan “Mencius” interpretation as an example, through Chuanshan ’s criticism of Zhu Zi and his later studies and Lu Xun’ s eccentricities, reveals the political philosophical orientation and “learning” of Chuanshan “Mencius” interpretation both internally and externally .