论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨甲氨蝶呤及米非司酮两种异位妊娠保守治疗方式分析。方法采用回顾性及追踪随访的方法,研究输卵管保守治疗方式分析及术后3个月的输卵管复通情况、随访2年的妊娠情况。结果输卵管保守治疗的两种方式对比,证明甲氨蝶呤更加准确有效,明显优于米非司酮法。保守治疗成功后3个月复通率及随诊2年的再妊娠前两者无明显差别。结论甲氨蝶呤治疗异位妊娠治愈率明显优于米非司酮,但毒副作用明显大于后者。术后3个月复通率及2年的妊娠率无明显差别。
Objective To investigate the conservative treatment of methotrexate and mifepristone in two ectopic pregnancies. Methods The retrospective and follow-up methods were used to investigate the conservative treatment of tubal and the status of tubal recanalization at 3 months after operation. The pregnancy was followed up for 2 years. The results of conservative treatment of tubal contrast between the two ways to prove that methotrexate more accurate and effective, significantly better than the mifepristone law. Three months after conservative treatment, the success rate of recurrence and follow-up of 2 years before pregnancy was no significant difference between the two. Conclusion Methotrexate treatment of ectopic pregnancy cure rate was significantly better than mifepristone, but the side effects were significantly greater than the latter. There was no significant difference between the three-month recurrence rate and 2-year pregnancy rate.