论文部分内容阅读
行政主体因履行行政管理职能需要,往往作出允诺为自身设定义务,从而达到指引或激励相对人为一定行为的目的。该种行为在性质上具有独立性和双重性,体现为行政主体的公法义务。作出允诺行为本身是一种抽象行政行为,当相对人出现时,该行为向具体行政行为转变且具有可诉性。人民法院在受理此类案件时除应对行政主体“诺而不践”行为进行审查外,还应对允诺行为自身的合法性作出判断。
For the purpose of performing administrative functions, the administrative body often makes promises to set the obligations for itself so as to achieve the purpose of guiding or motivating the relative man for certain acts. Such kind of behavior is independent and dual in nature, which manifests itself as an obligation of public law of the administrative body. The act of making a promise is itself an abstract administrative act that changes to a specific administrative act and is actionable when the counterpart appears. When handling such cases, the people’s court shall, in addition to examining the administrative body’s “promise but not practice” conduct, judge the legitimacy of the promised act itself.