论文部分内容阅读
《刑事诉讼法》修改中,将“事实是证据”改为“材料是证据”是用西方国家的形式证据观取代了我国的实质证据观,是证据观的倒退。移植的证据排除规则对于排除物证、书证来说是反科学的。移植的“排除合理怀疑”的盖然性标准也不科学,因为盖然性根本不能作标准。移植的“无罪拟制”只是一个既不发生法律效力、更不能执行的虚假拟制。这次修改纠正了起诉不移送案卷的做法,但又允许侦查阶段委托辩护人。这是在侦查中虚构了控、辩关系。以上内容已使我国的证据制度具有了中西结合的倾向。如果按这一倾向继续走下去,中国的证据制度必将以“西化”而告终。我国的目标应当是:不要西化要创新。因为,创新才是硬道理。
In the revision of the “Criminal Procedure Law,” substituting “fact is evidence ” into “material is evidence ” is the concept of substantive evidence replaced by our country’s formal evidence view, which is a retrogressive view of evidence. Transplantation evidence exclusion rules for the exclusion of evidence, documentary evidence is anti-scientific. The transplanted “reasonable suspicion” is not scientific norms, because probabilistic simply can not be used as a standard. Transplantation “innocent fiction” is just a fictitious fabrication that is neither legally enforceable nor enforceable. The amendment corrected the practice of prosecuting the case file but did not allow the defender to be appointed during the investigation stage. This is fictional control in the investigation, the relationship between defense. The above content has made the evidence system of our country have a tendency of combining Chinese with Western. If we continue this trend, the evidence system in China will eventually end with Westernization. Our goal should be: Do not Westernization to innovation. Because innovation is the last word.