论文部分内容阅读
清前期《近思录》代表性注本甚多,《四库全书》仅收入了茅星来《近思录集注》、江永《近思录集注》,而对于当时影响力甚至超越二者的施璜《发明》、张伯行《集解》等注本却未收录。从政治、学术、文化思想层面解析其背后的复杂因素,发现施、张二人注本的出现、广布,符合社会多层面需要;但“汉学专制”局面、汉宋门户之见,使得非汉学考据家的著述难以受到关注,清代的文化宰制对《四库》选书有着至关重要的影响,往往因人而废其言、弃其书。而茅、江二人注本被选入的主因,不仅关乎其本身呈现出的考据特色,而且得益于时代思潮相助与汉学家推重。《近思录》文献在清代的流布呈亚铃状的情形,与乾嘉时期政治、学术思想的转变、过分尊汉抑宋、君王文化摧残不无关系。
In the early Qing Dynasty, “Si Si Si Lu” represented a lot of notes, “Sikuquanshu” only income of Mao Xing to “think Si Ji Notes”, Jiang Yong “Si Si Lu Qu Notes”, but at the time even beyond the influence of both Shihuang “invention”, Zhang Bohang “Settlement” and other notes are not included. From the political, academic, cultural and ideological levels to analyze the complex factors behind it, found that Shi, Zhang two people note the emergence of a broad, in line with the needs of the multi-faceted society; but “Han dictatorship ” situation, It is difficult to pay attention to the writings of Sinology test writers. The cultural slaughter in the Qing Dynasty had a crucial influence on the selection of “Si Ku” books. However, the main reason why Mao and Jiang were chosen was not only related to the characteristics of the test which they themselves showed, but also benefited from the help of the times and the sinologists. The situation of “Si Si Si Lu” in the Qing dynasty was in the shape of an Asian bell, which was related to the change of political and academic thoughts during the Qianghong and Jiaqing periods.