论文部分内容阅读
本文以江南文士高士奇于康熙二十一年(1682)扈从康熙帝巡幸东北边疆,及其《扈从东巡日录》一书所载之内容为线索,讨论汉人在边疆的特殊经验及视域表现,并且兼及东北地区之于满洲统治的特殊性地位。内文首先讨论康熙帝举行东巡的原因,以深入吉林边地的第二次东巡为中心,发现各方记载的此次东巡的内容,差异颇大。其次讨论高士奇得以扈从东巡的原因,以及其《扈从东巡日录》的内容特色,进而分析高士奇如何描述东北边疆,又以何种元素、形式连接其自身文化背景。最后讨论东巡结束后高士奇随即出版《扈从东巡日录》,而书中康熙帝的文士形象,却与他谕示的“勿染汉习”原则颇有矛盾,且无论康熙帝与高士奇,他们所呈现的东北均混杂了满洲故土及边塞绝域两种概念,是故清初至十八世纪以后满洲统治者与东北故土的关系虽有连续性,也有差异。
In this paper, Jiangnan scholar Gao Shiqi in the reign of Emperor Kangxi in 1682 (1682), Emperor Kang Xi emperor patrolled the northeastern frontier, and his “Hu-kung East Tour Papers” contained in the book as a clue to discuss the Han Chinese special experience and vision Performance, and also the special status of Northeast China in Manchuria rule. The article begins with a discussion of the reasons why Emperor Kangxi held the east patrol to center on the second eastbound tour of Jilin’s border areas and found that the contents of the east patrol recorded by various parties differed widely. Secondly, it discusses the reason why Gao Shih was able to go eastward, and the content of his “Hu-kong-patrolled Eastern Tour”. Then it analyzes how Goldschke describes the northeastern frontier and what elements and forms connect his own cultural background. Finally, after the conclusion of the East Tour, Goldsmith immediately published the “Hu-kong East Tour Patrol,” while the image of Emperor Kangxi in the book contradicted his principle of " The two concepts mixed with Goldschich and the northeast they present are the Manchu native land and the frontier land. Therefore, the continuity of the Manchu rulers and the northeast homeland between the Qing Dynasty and the eighteenth century is also different.