论文部分内容阅读
本文系统分析了ＷＴＯ争端解决机制内的印度诉欧共体床单案。通过分析，笔者发现在本案中ＷＴＯ争端解决局对《反倾销协议》中的一些基本概念“倾销幅度”、“倾销” 等作了清晰的界定；对协议第１５条对发展中国家的优惠条款做出了解释。笔者认为ＷＴＯ争端解决局在个案报告中对协议文本做出的解释具有类似司法解释的效力，我们应加强对个案的研究，来应对我国加入ＷＴＯ后面临反倾销的压力。
This article systematically analyzes the case of India v. EC in the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. Through the analysis, I found that in the present case, the WTO Dispute Settlement Office clearly defined some basic concepts such as “dumping margin” and “dumping” in the “Anti-Dumping Agreement.” I also made a clear definition of the preferential terms for developing countries under Article 15 of the Agreement Out of explanation. I think the WTO Dispute Settlement Office in the case report on the interpretation of the agreement text has a similar judicial interpretation of the effectiveness of the case we should strengthen research to deal with China’s accession to the WTO after facing the pressure of anti-dumping.