论文部分内容阅读
由于我国民事研究起步晚,对人格权研究较为薄弱,其人格权中的隐私权历来与阴私相混淆,同时又受到中国特有的文化影响,其保护的程度和保护的方法没有受到立法者的重视,在我国私法领域中的成文法律中,没有一部法律有明确的隐私权保护内容,仅仅在司法实践中,遇到隐私权问题时,司法解释予以规定,以名誉权的名义来保护隐私权。因而我国隐私权保护立法不足是很显然的。
Because of the late start of civil studies in China, the research on personality right is relatively weak. The privacy of personality right has always been confused with the private and the private. At the same time, it has been influenced by the unique Chinese culture. The degree of protection and the method of protection are not influenced by legislators It is important to note that in the law of written law in the field of private law in our country, none of the laws has a clear protection of the right to privacy. Only in judicial practice, when faced with the issue of privacy, judicial interpretation provides for the protection of privacy by the name of reputation right. Therefore, China’s lack of privacy protection legislation is clear.