论文部分内容阅读
2012年8月14日,公安部、重庆市政府召开新闻发布会,宣布周克华遭警方击毙。由于警方并未公布死者的正面照,有网友经过“分析”现场照片后发帖称死亡者并非周克华,而是一名便衣民警。与普通公众相比,警方显然掌握着更多的资讯,而网民的关注自然而然地会转化为对细节的审视,一些重要的细节如果受到质疑,哪怕是误解,也很容易造成难辨真伪的信息,以加速度传播,警方此时的静默只能是变主动为被动,无形当中给自己制造压力。好在8月19日上午重庆市公安局网安总队总算有了回应,可惜警方微博除了重申周克华已死毫无疑问,比外并没拿出比如监控视频等有说服力的证据,更将网民的质疑归为误解或造谣,并称,网友的“幽默”总是那么到位。同时表示“警方随时欢迎大家的质疑,但是请不要用假货来质疑。”
On August 14, 2012, the Ministry of Public Security and Chongqing Municipal Government held a press conference announcing that Zhou Kehua was shot dead by the police. As the police did not announce the deceased’s positive photos, some netizens post “photos” after the scene photos and claim that the deceased was not Zhou Kehua but an undercover civilian police officer. Compared with the general public, the police apparently have more information, and netizens’ attention naturally turns into the examination of details. If some important details are questioned, even misunderstandings can easily lead to the illegibility of authenticity Information, to accelerate the spread of the silence of the police at this time can only be the initiative to become passive, creating pressure to create their own invisible. Fortunately, in the morning of August 19, the Public Security Bureau of Chongqing Public Security Bureau finally responded. Unfortunately, the Weibo microblogging reiterated that Zhou Kehua was dead. Undoubtedly, it did not come up with convincing evidence such as surveillance video, Internet users classified as misunderstood or rumors questioned, and said, friends “humor ” is always so in place. At the same time said “Police always welcome everyone’s question, but please do not use fake to challenge. ”