论文部分内容阅读
当年陈源技穷 ,以“绍兴师爷”对鲁迅作人身攻击。上世纪 80年代后 ,多有学者论及此事 ,然持论与陈源相似 ,鲁迅研究由此呈现了一个怪圈 :跨越了两个世纪 ,关于鲁迅与绍兴师爷之话题 ,我们最终还是回到了陈源那里。文章认为 ,鲁迅与绍兴师爷有着质的不同 ,不能混淆。但在思维方式、文字表达 ,乃至某些性格表征上 ,又确有相似之处 ,其原因并非是鲁迅“继承”了绍兴师爷的传统 ,而是因为他们都植根于同一地域文化的土壤之中 ,越文化的某些“基因” ,决定了二者之间有某些共通的文化表征
In the past, Chen Yuan was poor and attacked Lu Xun personally with “Shaoxing Master”. After the 1980s, many scholars talked about this matter. However, similar to Chen Yuan, Lu Xun’s research presented a vicious circle: It took more than two centuries to talk about the topics of Lu Xun and Shaoxing Master and finally we came back to Chen Source there. The article holds that Lu Xun and Shaoxing teachers have different qualities and can not be confused. However, there are some similarities in the way of thinking, the expression of words and even some characterization. The reason for this is not that Lu Xun inherited the tradition of Shaoxing teachers, but because they are rooted in the soil of the same regional culture Some “genes” of Chinese and Vietnamese cultures determine some common cultural representations between the two