论文部分内容阅读
宋珅:在刚结束的全国两会上,您作为作家和政协委员,提出要在中国设立一个世界性的文学奖,在网上引起热议。这一提案是出于怎样的考虑?赵丽宏:关于设立中国的世界文学奖,其实我已经思考了很多年。在上海也曾多次提出建议,本来想,北京不做这件事,上海或其他地方也可以来做,当然,是由民间来做。在一些人眼里,这是件小事,无关国计民生,可有可无。人家诺贝尔奖办了一百年,中国人能做到吗?现在很多中国人没有文化自信,认为一切最好的、最有权威和公信力的,都在西方,对文学的评判,也是西方说了算,中国只有被西方批评的资格,没有评判西方的权利和能力。所以设立中国的世界文学奖声音一出,便有人断章取义,发
Song 珅: At the just concluded two sessions of the Chinese people, you, as a writer and a member of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, proposed to set a world-wide literary prize in China, arousing heated discussion online. This proposal is out of what consideration? Zhao Lihong: On the establishment of China’s World Literature Award, in fact, I have thought for many years. There have been many suggestions in Shanghai. Originally, Beijing did not want to do this. Shanghai or other places can also do this. Of course, it is done by the people. In the eyes of some people, this is a trivial matter that has nothing to do with the national economy and people’s livelihood. Now that many Chinese people have no cultural confidence, they think that all the best, the most authoritative and the most credible are in the West. The judgments on literature are also made by the West For one thing, China is not eligible for criticism from the West and has no judgment on the rights and capabilities of the West. Therefore, when the voice of China’s World Literature Prize was set forth, some people took out sentences out of context and made fat