浅论学术理论刊物编辑的博与专

• 作 者: 翁芝光
• 出 处: 现代台湾研究
• 发表日期: 2001年06期
• 关键词: 刊物编辑 编辑素质 编辑人员 学者型 名编辑 编辑工作 学术刊物 编辑活动 台湾问题 编辑过程

学术理论刊物编辑的所必备编辑素质问题在业界基本上已有共识,唯有编辑的学者素质在编辑学界争论已久,且长期以来没有定论。有的人认为学术刊物的编辑必须走学者化的道路,必须成为某一学科的专家,即“学者型编辑”;有的人认为,作为一名编辑只要精通编辑学理论,努力使自己成为编辑学的研究学者,即“编辑型学者”。本文拟从剖析两方面的观点人手,阐明学术理论刊物编辑必须“博”“专”兼备,以说明编辑人员具备学者素质的必要性与重要性。

The editors of academic journal editors have basically reached a consensus on the quality of compiling editors. Only the quality of scholarly editors has long been debated in the editorial community and it has long been inconclusive. Some people think that editors of academic journals must take the scholarly path and must become experts in a subject, that is, “scholarly editors.” Some people think that as an editor, he should only master editorial theory and strive to make himself Become a research scholar, “editorial scholar ”. This paper attempts to analyze the manpower from two perspectives and clarify that editors of academic journals must have both “Bo ” and “Adhoc” to illustrate the necessity and importance of editorial staff with the quality of scholars.