论文部分内容阅读
传统冲突法理论在“冲突法为何存在”问题上有一定的解释力,但仍存在视阈度狭隘、时空普适度不够及理论工具受限等不足,有待弥合。建构主义理论指向的“多元行为体互动构建而成的国际社会”为冲突法“协调多元主体利益”提供了功能场域;其“国家行为体中心论”及“规范的建构作用”为理解“回家去趋势”的客观性提供新的理路;该理论对“文化身份”的阐发解释了为何在已有实体规则存在的领域仍可能有冲突法规范的存在,从而展现了冲突法维护法律文化的独特本质。在建构主义视域下,冲突法是交融“协调多元利益和维护文化身份”二者功能的最佳途径。
The traditional theory of conflict law has some explanatory power in the question of why “the conflict law exists,” but there are still some shortcomings, such as the narrow view threshold, the insufficient generality of time and space and the limitation of the theoretical tools. The “international community” constructed by the interaction of pluralistic actors pointed by constructivism provides a functional area for the conflict law ’s to coordinate the interests of multiple parties “and its ” State actor center theory “and ” norms “The theory of” cultural identity “elucidates why there may still be a law of conflict in areas where existing substantive rules exist The existence of norms, thus demonstrating the unique nature of conflict law to maintain legal culture. From the perspective of constructivism, conflict of laws is the best way to blend the functions of ”coordinating multiple interests and preserving cultural identity."