论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术中手术室的护理干预效果。方法选取2014年7月—2016年7月福建医科大学附属第二医院进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗的80例患者作为研究对象,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组40例。其中对照组患者实施常规护理,观察组患者在对照组基础上进行手术室护理干预。对比两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后躁动情况、住院时间、疼痛分级和患者满意率。结果与对照组相比,观察组患者的手术时间[(72.36±19.68)min vs.(89.75±29.47)min]和住院时间[(4.12±2.03)d vs.(5.64±2.18)d]较短,术后出血量[(38.42±22.31)ml vs.(52.29±27.64)ml]和术后躁动评分[(2.11±2.03)分vs.(3.39±2.98)分]较低,而疼痛有效改善率(80.00%vs.52.50%)和患者满意率(95.00%vs.75.00%)较高,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论加强腹腔镜胆囊切除术术中手术室的护理干预有利于患者术后康复和满意度地提升。
Objective To investigate the effect of nursing intervention in operation room of laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients. Methods From July 2014 to July 2016, 80 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University were selected as study subjects and randomly divided into observation group and control group, 40 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were given routine nursing care. Patients in the observation group were treated with operation room nursing intervention on the basis of the control group. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative agitation, hospitalization time, pain grade and patient satisfaction rate were compared between the two groups. Results Compared with the control group, the operative time [(72.36 ± 19.68) min vs. (89.75 ± 29.47) min] and hospital stay [(4.12 ± 2.03) d vs. (5.64 ± 2.18) d] in the observation group were shorter , Postoperative bleeding volume (38.42 ± 22.31) ml vs. (52.29 ± 27.64) ml and postoperative agitation score (2.11 ± 2.03) vs (3.39 ± 2.98), respectively, while the effective rate of pain improvement (80.00% vs.52.50%) and patients’ satisfaction rate (95.00% vs.75.00%), the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusions Nursing intervention in operation room during laparoscopic cholecystectomy is beneficial to patients’ recovery and satisfaction after operation.