论巨额财产来源不明罪之举证责任

• 作 者: 王松波
• 机 构: 中国政法大学研究生院
• 出 处: 中国刑事法杂志
• 发表日期: 1999年05期
• 关键词: 巨额财产来源不明罪 程序分析 合法收入 举证责任 国家工作人员

在我国刑事诉讼中,理论上一般都认为无论对公诉案件,还是对自诉案件,犯罪嫌疑人、被告人都不负举证责任,但在“巨额财产来源不明”的案件中,犯罪嫌疑人、被告人负举证责任却属例外。其理论根据是我国刑法第３９５条“国家工作人员的财产或者支出明显超过合法收入,差额巨大的,可

In China’s criminal proceedings, the theory is generally considered that both prosecution cases, or private prosecution cases, suspects, defendants are not responsible for the burden of proof, but in the “huge source of property unknown” case, the suspects, the defendants Negative burden of proof is an exception. The theoretical basis is Article 395 of the Criminal Law of our country. "The property or expenditure of state staff obviously exceeds the legal income and the difference is huge.