论文部分内容阅读
农地三权分置立法需要破解法理认知误区,并根据立法目的明确制度选择。首先应对政策表述、政策目标深入理解,对政策实施状况及存在问题进行分析,以利于法律转化更精确、对实践的针对性更强。未来较长一段时期的制度设计方向应该是:为经营权解除不当限制并进行动态监管,既放活又警惕,形成三种权利的相对平衡格局。目前三权分置政策承担的功能太多,政策负担过重,将来立法必须适度剥离农地的附加功能,凸显农地的经济功能。可采取修改法律名称并增设专门章节的方式,构建双权利证制度、农地市场分级制度、产权交易服务制度、鼓励粮食生产制度、农地流转风险保障金制度等,有效化解农地非农化、非粮化等实践风险。
The separation of the three rights of farmland legislation needs to break the misunderstanding of legal knowledge and clarify the choice of system according to the legislative purpose. First of all, we should make a thorough understanding of policy formulation and policy objectives, and analyze the implementation status and existing problems of policies in order to facilitate a more accurate legal conversion and a more targeted practice. For a long period of time, the design direction of the system should be: to lift undue restrictions on the right to operate and to exercise dynamic supervision, both deactivation and vigilance to form a relatively balanced pattern of the three kinds of rights. At present, the functions of the separation of powers under the three rights system are too many and the policies are overburdened. In the future, legislation must appropriately divert the additional functions of agricultural land and highlight the economic functions of the agricultural land. We can adopt the method of modifying the name of the law and adding special chapters to construct a dual rights certificate system, a classification system for agricultural land market, a system of property rights and transaction services, a system of grain production encouragement, and a security system for agricultural land transfer risks so as to effectively address the non-agriculturalization of farmland , Non-food and other practical risks.