论文部分内容阅读
随着WTO第一次把货物贸易、服务贸易、与贸易有关的知识产权等议题纳入一揽子协议,一种新的报复形式——“交叉报复”出现在争端解决机制中,通过在不同协议中分别或同时实施报复,加大WTO的执行力度。WTO运行14年来,涉及交叉报复的案例已有三例,但均未付诸实施。围绕着交叉报复问题的争论从未间断,上诉机构在案例中作出了重要的司法解释,促使人们进一步反思交叉报复在政治和法律上的局限性。
With WTO for the first time including such issues as goods trade, service trade and trade-related intellectual property rights as a package agreement, a new type of retaliation - “cross-retaliation” appears in the dispute settlement mechanism. Through different agreements In retaliation respectively or simultaneously, increase the implementation of the WTO. In the 14 years since WTO was put into operation, there have been three cases involving cross-revenge, but none of them have been put into practice. The debate surrounding cross-retaliation has never stopped. The appellate body has made important judicial interpretations in the case, prompting one to further reflect on the political and legal limitations of cross-retaliation.