论文部分内容阅读
近年来,Suanson和Robbia等人提出一个交替最优呼吸控制器的模型,他们试图通过预测通气量对血内碳酸过多和肌肉运动的反应来寻找加法工作过程。已有大量文献证明早期提出的最优控制器模型,在V_E控制下,运动和不同化学物输入的相互作用存在着加法关系。他们假设乘法模型并不在所有实验中总是成立的。本文指出了Swanson和Robbin提出的模型的一些缺点,包括:(1)在低碳运动和CO_2吸入时系统具有乘法过程,并无加法过程。但他们既没有提到,也没解释选择加法特性数据的原理。他们不恰当地将仅有刺激元的“加法”或“乘法”作用的响应解释成由于系统力学限制的
In recent years, Suanson and Robbia et al. Have proposed a model of alternating optimal respiratory controllers that seeks to find an additive procedure by predicting the response of ventilation to intracarotid hypermotility and muscle movement. There are a large number of documents that prove the optimal controller model proposed in the early stage. Under V_E control, there exists an additive relationship between the motion and the interaction of different chemical inputs. They assume that the multiplicative model does not always hold in all experiments. This paper points out some shortcomings of the model proposed by Swanson and Robbin, including: (1) The system has a multiplication process with low-carbon exercise and CO 2 inhalation, and there is no addition process. However, they did not mention or explain the principle of choosing additive characterization data. They improperly interpret the response of the “additive” or “multiplicative” effect of the stimulus alone as a result of systematic mechanics limitations