论文部分内容阅读
班氏一家父子兄妹历时三、四十载撰成的《汉书》,对我国传统史学的巨大贡献,古今皆有肯定。现代史家运用马克思主义观点研究《汉书》,成就远远超过前人。略嫌不足的是对它的十《志》部分,除《食货志》外,甚少专文探究。特别是其中的《五行志》,评论《汉书》者大多以之作为作者“五德相生”、“天人感应”唯心史观的集中表现,而予以否定。这是值得研究的。确实,《汉书》作者把儒家经典与谶纬神学紧密结合,制造了一种准宗教式的油彩,这层油彩特别使《五行志》神秘化了。但这仅仅是问题的一面。在这神秘化的外壳之内,它还包藏着许多对我们今天颇有价值的多方面的古代信息,特别是在科学技术方面。
Ban's family and sons and dads lasted three or four decades of written “Han”, the great contribution to the traditional Chinese history, both ancient and modern. Modern historians use the Marxist point of view to study “Han”, far more success than their predecessors. Slightly inadequate is its ten “Chi” part, with the exception of “Food and Goods”, very few articles to explore. In particular, most of the “Five Lines” and “Han” commentators criticize it as the concentrated manifestation of the author's “Five Germanism and the Living” and “Nature and Man-Induced” idealistic views of history. This is worth studying. Indeed, the author of “Han” closely integrates the Confucian classics with the weft-wise theology, creating a quasi-religious oil painting, which in particular has mystified the “Five Elements.” But this is just the problem side. Within this mystical shell, it contains many ancient messages of great value to us today, especially in science and technology.