论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨网络成瘾者内隐自尊的特点及其与外显自尊的关系。方法采用内隐联想测验和自尊量表进行测试。结果从总体来看,网络成瘾组的内隐自尊水平与控制组差异有统计学意义(315.46±199.68/199.61±136.86,t=3.03,P<0.01);网络成瘾组的整体内隐自尊、学业内隐自尊、人际内隐自尊和家庭内隐自尊均高于控制组(t=2.24,P<0.05;t=2.74,P<0.01;t=3.58,P=0.001;t=3.70,P<0.001);网络成瘾组的内隐自尊水平高于外显自尊,控制组的外显自尊水平高于内隐自尊,两组被试的内隐自尊和外显自尊的分离状况差异有统计学意义(0.923 7±1.457 9/-0.923 7±0.785 4,t=-7.055,P=0.000)。结论网络成瘾组的内隐自尊水平高于外显自尊,控制组的外显自尊水平高于内隐自尊;网络成瘾组和控制组内隐自尊和外显自尊的分离状况差异有统计学意义。
Objective To explore the characteristics of implicit self-esteem and its relationship with explicit self-esteem in internet addicts. Methods Implicit association test and self-esteem scale test. Results Overall, the level of implicit self-esteem in internet addiction group was significantly different from that in control group (315.46 ± 199.68 / 199.61 ± 136.86, t = 3.03, P <0.01). The overall implicit self-esteem , Implicit self-esteem, interpersonal implicit self-esteem and implicit self-esteem in the family were higher than those in the control group (t = 2.24, P <0.05; t = 2.74, P <0.01; <0.001). The level of implicit self-esteem in internet addiction group was higher than that of explicit self-esteem, and the level of explicit self-esteem in control group was higher than that of implicit self-esteem. There was statistical difference between the two groups in implicit self-esteem and explicit self-esteem Significance (0.923 7 ± 1.457 9 / -0.923 7 ± 0.785 4, t = -7.055, P = 0.000). Conclusion The level of implicit self-esteem in internet addiction group is higher than that of explicit self-esteem, and the level of explicit self-esteem in control group is higher than that of implicit self-esteem. There are statistically significant differences in the status of implicit self-esteem and explicit self-esteem in internet addiction group and control group significance.