论文部分内容阅读
董律师:我是河北丰润县的女职工,1987年与县里的蒋某结婚,1989年我所在单位分给我两间公产平房。后来因夫妻感情不合我提出离婚。可是双方在承租房子的问题上分岐较大,我要求两间都归我,因房子是我单位分给我的,另外,孩子由我抚养,我们娘俩得住两间房;男方则主张,因无房住必须给他一间房。法院于1993年9月判决男女方各承租一间还算合理。不料,男方1994年又向法院起诉,以我扰乱其居住为借口要求把我撵走。法院竟以我长期住娘家或住办公室有房住为由,把两间房全部判给男方承租。请问董律师这是否剥夺了我的承租权,侵犯我的居住权,法律对夫妻离婚时房屋处理有何规定,请解答指引。
Lawyer Dong: I am a female worker in Fengrun County, Hebei Province. In 1987, I married Jiangmou in the county. In 1989, my unit gave me two public housing bungalows. Later, because of marital relations, I divorced. However, the two sides differed greatly in the problem of renting houses. I asked both of them to belong to me because the house was given to me by my unit. In addition, the children were raised by me and our mother and daughter were able to live in two rooms. The man argued, Because of the absence of housing must give him a room. In September 1993, the court ruled that it would be reasonable for both men and women to rent one. Unexpectedly, the man sued the court again in 1994 and asked me to walk away on the pretext of disturbing his residence. The court ordered me to let both men and women rent the two rooms on the ground that I lived in a maternity or living office for a long time. Will Lawyer Dong deprive me of tenancy rights, infringe upon my right of abode, laws governing the handling of houses when divorced by law, please answer the guidelines.