论文部分内容阅读
2011年《道路交通安全法》再次修改后,围绕第七十六条第二款归责原则仍然是见仁见智、褒贬不一。运用经济分析的方法分析侵权法中过错责任原则、严格责任原则的优劣,明确指出任何单一归责原则都可能造成激励失灵。混合责任原则通过控制预防措施与活动程度,使社会活动能够积极进行同时又不至于产生过大的风险。《道路交通安全法》第七十六条第二款遵循了混合责任原则,奉行以无过错责任原则为主,有限制的过错责任原则为辅的归责模式,符合最优经济选择。
After the “Road Traffic Safety Law” was revised again in 2011, the principle of imputation surrounding Article 76, paragraph 2, is still a matter of opinion, with mixed opinions. Using the method of economic analysis to analyze the principle of fault liability in tort law and the principle of strict liability, it is clearly pointed out that any single principle of imputation may cause incentive failure. The principle of mixed responsibility By controlling the degree of precautionary measures and activities, social activities can be actively carried out without undue risk. The second paragraph of Article 76 of the Road Traffic Safety Law follows the principle of mixed responsibility and follows the imputation model supplemented by the principle of no-fault liability and supplemented by the principle of fault liability, which is in line with the optimal economic choice.