论文部分内容阅读
渴望跟俄罗斯作家们交流文学情况,一方面出于早年就有个俄罗斯文学情结;另一方面,则缘于自己对当下俄罗斯的文学情状已近乎无知。此次来访的十多位俄国客人中,俄罗斯作协主席加尼切夫、俄罗斯作协共同主席拉斯普京虽然是知道的,也就是略知一二了。这很让人感慨不已:虽说俄罗斯苏维埃文学史上灿若星河的作家,我们可以如数家珍;虽说在文学史的当代延伸上,文学的包括超文学的原因会使我们对蒲宁、帕斯捷尔纳克、索尔仁尼琴、艾特玛托夫们留下深的印象和大的尊敬;然而,苏联“解体”乃至还可以上推到“解冻”以后,俄罗斯这块土地上的文学事实和总体风貌,我们还是所知太少。对于互为最大临邦且历史渊源深厚的中俄两个文化之邦,这差不多算得是文化交往上的一次小小断流,显见得不太正常。
Desire to exchange literary situation with Russian writers, on the one hand out of Russian literature complex in the early years; on the other hand, because of their current Russian literary situation is almost ignorance. Among the more than a dozen Russian guests who visited this trip, Russian President Garchich Cheikhovich and Russian co-chairman Las Putin although they knew and understood a little. This is very impressive: Although the writer of the Can Xing River in the history of the Russian Soviet literature, we can be familiar with each other; although in the contemporary extension of literary history, literary reasons including super-literary will make us to Puning, Solzhenitsyn and Aitmatov left deep impression and great respect; however, the “collapse” of the Soviet Union could even be pushed up to the literary facts on the land of Russia after “thawing” Overall style, we still know too little. For the two countries with the largest and the highest level of history, it is almost a trivial matter in cultural exchanges, which is obviously not quite normal.