论文部分内容阅读
钱荣贵在《学术界》2002年第6期著文指出,近年来,“核心期刊”的原始功能逐步退化,评价功能渐趋突出,使用价值随之泛化。“核心期刊”被广泛运用于津贴评定、职称评审、论文评奖、期刊评价等领域,已全然演变成一种评价尺度,并与知识分子的切身利益紧密相连。尽管目前学界对其认识不一,但“核心期刊”对学术界、期刊界的危害已昭然若揭,不容置疑。其一,以刊物是否“核心”来评判论文学术水平的高低,不仅直接导致了科研评价体系的异化,而
Qian Ronggui pointed out in his article “The Academic Circles of 2002” that in 2002, the original functions of “core periodicals” gradually degenerated, their evaluation functions became more prominent and the value of their use generalized. The core journals are widely used in the fields of allowance appraisal, job title review, thesis awarding and periodical appraisal, which have evolved into an evaluation standard and are closely linked with the vital interests of intellectuals. Although the current understanding of the academic circles varies, the harm done by the “core periodical” to academia and periodicals is clear and undeniable. First, judging whether the publication is “core” to judge the academic level of a dissertation not only leads directly to the dissimilation of the scientific evaluation system