论文部分内容阅读
现有技术抗辩是侵犯专利权抗辩制度中极为重要的一种抗辩方式。虽然2008年专利法第六十二条的规定已将其作为一种抗辩权予以法定化,但是司法实践中对其具体适用条件仍然存有争议,包括现有技术抗辩的适用范围、可以援引的现有技术的范围、技术比对顺序等。本案中,法院对上述问题均作出了相应的回答。另外,本案亦可作为当原告损失、被告获利等均难以确定的情况下,适用法定赔偿确定赔偿数额时须考量因素的参照。
The prior art defense is an extremely important countermeasure in the patent infringement system. Although the provisions of Article 62 of the Patent Law of 2008 have been legalized as a form of defense, the specific conditions for its application in judicial practice remain controversial, including the scope of application of the existing technical defense, which can be invoked The extent of the prior art, the order of technical comparison, and the like. In this case, the court made the corresponding answers to the above questions. In addition, the case can also serve as a reference for factors to be considered when determining the amount of compensation for statutory compensation where the losses of the plaintiff or the profits of the defendant are difficult to determine.