论文部分内容阅读
我所在的高校又要进行教师工资改革了,改革把教师分为十三级,其中教授四级,副教授三级,每级都有严格的水平要求。此事颇为复杂,不想多谈。我想谈的是其中涉及的学术声誉问题。这是一个关系到当今中国学术(至少是人文学术)的大问题:如何评价一个学者?如何评价一个教授?通观整个分级体系的标准,可以发现,除了无数的量化标准,最重要的一条非量化标准是“学术声誉”。比如:“在本学科领域有较高的学术造诣,在国
The colleges and universities in which I live are subject to the reform of teachers’ salaries. The reform divides teachers into thirteen classes, including four professors and three associate professors, each with strict level requirements. The matter is rather complicated, do not want to talk about. I want to talk about the academic reputation issues involved. This is a big question that concerns today’s Chinese academic (or at least humanistic): how to evaluate a scholar? How to evaluate a professor? To look at the whole hierarchy of standards, we can see that in addition to numerous quantitative criteria, the most important one is non-quantified The standard is ”academic reputation “. For example: ”In this discipline has a higher academic attainments in the country