论文部分内容阅读
目的比较分析互助献血者与自愿无偿献血者血液检测结果,探讨互助献血的安全性。方法对杭州地区2013年4-7月5 171人次互助献血者(互助献血组)和50 227人次自愿无偿献血者(自愿献血组)血液检测结果进行比较分析,采用SPSS20.0软件进行X2检验。结果互助献血组血液检测总不合格率高于自愿献血组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。互助献血组的血液核酸、HBSAg和梅毒抗体阳性率均高于自愿献血组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而2组间抗-HCV、抗-HIV阳性率差异无统计学意义。结论互助献血者血液检测指标相对风险较大,在献血前应加强宣传教育和正确引导。
Objective To compare and analyze blood test results of mutual aid blood donors and voluntary blood donors to explore the mutual donation blood safety. Methods Blood samples were collected from 51 171 blood donors (mutual aid blood donors) and 50 227 voluntary blood donors (volunteer blood donors) from April to July in 2013 in Hangzhou area. The results of X2 test were analyzed by SPSS 20.0 software. Results Mutual donation group blood test total failure rate was higher than voluntary blood donation group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.01). The positive rate of blood nucleic acid, HBSAg and syphilis antibody in blood donation group were higher than those in voluntary donation group (P <0.05), but the positive rates of anti-HCV and anti-HIV in the two groups had no statistical significance. Conclusion Mutual aid blood donors blood test relative risk, blood donation should strengthen publicity and education and correct guidance.