论文部分内容阅读
目的:通过比较不孕症患者与正常人群社会观念和社会心理状况,为开展不孕症心理和行为干预提供参考依据。方法:采用相同问卷访问不孕症患者和对照人群,应用χ2和t检验方法比较两组人群看法和心理状况差异。结果:①病例组和对照组人群在年龄、职业、文化程度、家庭收入方面分布比例相同,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),排除了因这些因素产生的偏倚。②两组人群都存在一些错误的看法,大约30.0的人认同“不孝有三、无后为大”的看法,病例组和对照组分别有37.90和29.60的人“担心家庭没有继后”。③比较两组人群在1个月内良好感觉评分,其中病例组得分为2.979±1.09,对照组3.249±0.996,病例组要低于对照组人群,t检验发现差异有统计学意义(t=4.543,P<0.001)。结论:两组人群思想观念看法差异不显著,但是不孕症患者人群更容易产生负面情绪,更容易忧伤和烦恼。
Objective: To compare the psychology and social psychology of patients with infertility and normal population, and to provide reference for psychology and behavior intervention in infertility. Methods: The same questionnaire was used to visit infertility patients and control subjects. Chi-square test and t-test were used to compare the differences in opinion and psychological status among the two groups. Results: ①The distribution proportion of age, occupation, educational level and family income of the case group and the control group were the same, with no significant difference (P> 0.05), which excluded the bias caused by these factors. ② There are some erroneous opinions in both groups. About 30.0 people agree with the view that “there are no filial piety and no big ones.” There are 37.90 and 29.60 people in the case and control groups respectively. ". (3) The scores of good sensation in two groups were compared within one month. The score of case group was 2.979 ± 1.09 and that of control group was 3.249 ± 0.996. The case group was lower than that of control group. There was significant difference in t test (t = 4.543 , P <0.001). Conclusion: There is no significant difference between the two groups in the way of thinking and thinking, but people in infertility are more likely to have negative emotions and are more likely to be sad and troubled.