论文部分内容阅读
政府采购是有关公共利益的重要财政支出活动。合同授予阶段采购人的主导性极易诱发权利寻租和不公平竞争,影响公共资金有效使用和行政政策切实实施,损害相对人利益,所以有必要为此阶段决标争议供应商提供有效的救济制度。我国的相关规定尚存权利主体范围过窄,救济事由不明确,救济模式单一,行政救济途径效率低下,暂停措施适用阶段过窄、适用情形不明和损害赔偿范围不明等诸多不足,应借鉴国外立法实践,对决标争议救济制度进行多方面完善。
Government procurement is an important financial expenditure related to the public interest. The dominance of the purchaser in the stage of contract award can easily induce the rent-seeking and unfair competition of rights, affect the effective use of public funds and the effective implementation of administrative policies, and harm the interests of the counterparts. Therefore, it is necessary to provide effective remedies to the suppliers of the dispute over this stage system. China’s relevant provisions of the surviving rights subject is too narrow, the cause of the relief is not clear, the relief model is a single, the administrative relief inefficient way, the stage of the suspension of the measure is too narrow, the applicable situation is unknown and the scope of the damage compensation is not clear and many other issues, should learn from foreign legislation Practice, improve the system of the resolution of the award winning controversy in many ways.