论文部分内容阅读
目的 :探究两种不同方法应用中期妊娠引产的临床效果。方法 :随机抽取我院在2013年4月至2016年3月期间接诊的90例中期引产的妊娠妇女为研究对象,将其按照抽签的形式均分为参照组(45例)和实验组(45例),参照组孕妇选取利凡诺配伍米非司酮引产,而实验组则采取水囊合米索前列醇、米非司酮引产,观察两组产妇的临床应用效果。结果 :实验组引产效果明显优于参照组,且不良反应发生率明显低于参照组,组间比较满足P<0.05,具有统计学意义。结论 :中期妊娠引产选取水囊合米索前列醇、米非司酮引产效果显著,缩短总产程时间,降低产后出血量,值得临床推广应用。
Objective: To explore the clinical effects of induction of labor in two different methods of pregnancy. Methods: A total of 90 pregnant women who were giving birth during the period of April 2013 to March 2016 in our hospital were randomly selected as the study objects, which were randomly divided into reference group (45 cases) and experimental group ( 45 cases), the reference group of pregnant women choose levofino compatibility mifepristone induced labor, while the experimental group was taken water bag combined misoprostol, mifepristone induction of labor to observe the clinical application of two groups of maternal effect. Results: The induction effect of experimental group was significantly better than that of reference group, and the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower than that of reference group. The comparison between groups satisfied P <0.05, with statistical significance. Conclusion: In the second trimester of pregnancy induced abortion, water ablation, misoprostol and mifepristone are effective in inducing labor, shortening the duration of labor and reducing the amount of postpartum hemorrhage, which is worthy of clinical application.