论文部分内容阅读
本文将价值转化为生产价格的转形问题争论分为三种基本的态度,即庞巴维克的态度、鲍特凯维奇的态度和“蒙昧主义者”的态度。庞巴维克的态度是一种马克思理论的终结者的批判态度,这在当代亦有广泛的代表,其中不乏有影响的经济学家;鲍特凯维奇的态度,是转形问题争论中建设性批判的典范,这种态度以完善马克思转形问题的解为出发点,做出了不少推进;“蒙昧主义者”的态度和庞巴维克态度针锋相对,这种态度不承认马克思在转形理论上会有任何错误和不足,而将其和马克思主义的其他理论一样奉为经典和教条,但这种态度已呈没落趋势。本文还认为马克思转形理论最大的问题是生产价格与市场价值这两个概念之间的矛盾。
This article divides the controversy over the transformation of value into production price into three basic attitudes, namely, Bombayvik’s attitude, Boutkiewicz’s attitude and “obscurantism” attitude. Bombavik’s attitude is a critical attitude of the terminator of Marxist theory, which is also widely represented in the contemporary era, some of whom are influential economists; the attitude of BECKKiewicz is a controversy over the transformational issue A model of constructive criticism. This attitude has proceeded quite well with the solution to the problem of transforming Marxism as a starting point. The attitude of “obscurantismist” is diametrically opposed to that of Bombawvik. This attitude does not recognize that Marxism is turning around There will be any mistakes and deficiencies in the theory of form, but it will be regarded as classics and doctrine in the same way as other theories of Marxism. However, this attitude has been declining. This article also argues that the biggest problem of Marx’s theory of transformation is the contradiction between the two concepts of production price and market value.