论文部分内容阅读
我国《刑法》第90条设定了民族自治地方的刑法变通或补充权,而《立法法》第8、9条又规定“有关犯罪和刑罚”的事项属于法律绝对保留事项。对于两者关系,学界仅有少数文献涉及,观点及论证也各自存在争议。通过细致比较不同法律规定,综合利用文义解释、目的解释、体系解释、目的性限缩等法律方法,疏理刑法变通权与法律保留原则之间的关系,提炼出逻辑完整的关于民族自治地方刑法变通权的法律规则。
Article 90 of China’s Criminal Law sets the power of adaptation or supplement to criminal law in ethnic autonomous areas. Articles 8 and 9 of the Legislation Law also stipulate that “matters relating to crimes and penalties” belong to the law’s absolute reservation. For the relationship between the two, only a few literatures involved in the academic community, opinions and arguments are each controversial. By careful comparison of different legal provisions, the comprehensive utilization of legal interpretations such as the textual interpretation, the purposive explanation, the system explanation and the limited purpose of limitation, etc., clarifies the relationship between the right of modification of the criminal law and the principle of legal reservation, and extracts the complete logic about the autonomous areas Legal Rules of Criminal Law.