论文部分内容阅读
戴震是清代雍正至乾隆中期在世的一位学者。纵观戴震研究的历史,基本上它总是围绕着三个话题展开:方法论、政治倾向和学术脉络。戴震的方法确实极具魅力。但和实证主义没有紧密关系;戴震反对专制,但为此给出的哲学阐述却非常曲折复杂,他没有民主观念,并不积极地反抗权力,他跟权力保持距离.却的确具有近似启蒙思想的话语;戴震也不是实用主义或者功利主义者,他和《宋史》所称的道学家十分相似,只是不同意朱子学的基本假设而已。如果还其本来面目,戴震哲学的核心价值其实在于他所谓“以己之情,絮人之情.而无不得其平也”的是非判定法则,而这一法则使儒家传统在当代继续发展成为可能。
Dai Zhen is a scholar living in the middle of Emperor Qianlong in the Qing Dynasty. Throughout the history of Dai Zhen’s research, basically it has always revolved around three topics: methodology, political orientation and academic context. Dai Zhen really attractive way. But there is no close relationship with positivism; Dai Zhen opposes tyranny, but the philosophical exposition given for this purpose is very tortuous and complex. He has no democratic concept and does not actively oppose the power. He maintains his distance from power but does have similar enlightenment ideas Discourse; Dai Zhen is not a pragmatist or utilitarian, and he and the “Song” called Taoism very similar, but do not agree with the basic assumption of Zhu Xi only. If it is true, the core value of Dai Zhen’s philosophy lies in his non-judgmental rule that his so-called “empathy, flamboyant affection.” This law allowed Confucian tradition to continue in the contemporary era Development is possible.