论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨不同的实现手段对生命-经济决策的影响。方法使用海难决策问题,以正负框架×生命财产形式×挽救放弃方式进行描述。481名被试被随机分为8组,分别完成一道决策问题。结果框架、实现手段、问题形式主效应显著(χ2=17.979,29.707,39.723;P<0.01),正性框架、挽救型实现手段和经济问题形式下,人们更倾向保守方案,而负性框架、放弃型实现手段和生命问题,人们更倾向冒险方案;生命问题中,放弃型实现方式有违伦理道德,无论正性框架还是负性框架,人们都会选择冒险方案。结论框架描述(正性-负性)、实现手段(挽救-放弃)与问题形式(生命-财产)均能对决策产生影响。
Objective To explore the impact of different means of realization on life-economy decision-making. The method uses the problem of shipwreck decision-making and describes it in the form of positive frame, negative frame, life, property, saving, and abandonment. 481 subjects were randomly divided into 8 groups to complete a decision-making issue. Results framework, means of implementation, main effect of the problem form are significant (χ2 = 17.979, 29.707, 39.723; P <0.01), people tend to be more conservative in the form of positive frame, saving means and economic problems, Give up the realization of means and life issues, people are more inclined to risk programs; life issues, giving up the realization of ways contrary to ethics, whether positive or negative framework, people will choose the adventure program. Conclusion The framework (positive-negative), the means of realization (salvage-abandonment), and the problem form (life-property) all influence decision-making.