论文部分内容阅读
在中国封建社会里,儒法之间激烈的斗争从未停息过,它深入到上层建筑的各个领域,在科学技术这一阵地上也不例外。南北朝时,具有法家思想的科学家祖冲之和儒家思想代表戴法兴关于《大明历》的一埸辩论,便是一个很好的证明。祖冲之写了著名的《驳议》一文,逐条批驳戴法兴主张天命,反对革新的反动儒家观点。他热情歌颂了从秦始皇到汉武帝法家政治路线统治时期实行的历法改革,大胆蔑视儒家的“讖記碎言”;他反对“信古而疑今”的倒退观点,对被儒家奉为“万代不易”的古历法,敢于“正古今”,指摘其非;他反对“据文于图讖”的唯心论,主张唯物论的自然观。《驳议》是我国历法革新斗争中一篇代表法家进步思想的好文章,全文数千言,记载在《宋书·历志》里,很值得我们认真一读。
In the feudal society in China, the fierce struggle between Confucianism and law never stopped. It went deep into all fields of the superstructure, and it was no exception in science and technology. During the Northern and Southern Dynasties, it was a very good testimony that Zu Chongzhi, a scientist with a legalist mind, and Dai Fa-xing’s debating debate on “the Daming calendar” on behalf of Confucianism. Zu Chong wrote the famous “Dispute” article, one by one criticizing Dai Fa-hsing advocating fate and opposing revolutionary reactionary Confucianism. He enthusiastically celebrated the reform of the calendars implemented during the reign of Emperor Qin Shihuang and Han Wudi’s legal line and boldly scorned Confucian “shame”. He opposed the retrogressive view of “believing in ancient times and doubting today” The ancient calendar is not easy, “dare to” ancient and modern “, accusing him of not; he opposed” according to the text in the map “theory of nature, advocating the concept of nature of materialism. ”Refutation“ is a good article representing the progress of the legalists in the reforming calendar of our country. The full text is thousands of words and it is recorded in the ”History of the Song Dynasty." It deserves our careful reading.