论文部分内容阅读
在民族史学研究中,历来存在着两种根本不同的历史观,即唯物史观和唯心史观。前者是站在各民族人民群众所创造的现实历史的基础上,从物质实践出发,来解释客观的历史发展;后者则是站在帝王将相少数人物主宰历史的认识基础上,从人们的思想动机或观念出发,来阐述历史过程,从而导致对历史内容的歪曲。在旧的民族史学中,长期占主导位置的剥削阶级的封建史观,其根本要害就在于:以封建正统王朝的利益为转移,在观察与阐述民族和民族关系历史过程上,囿限于阶级的和民族的偏见。
In the study of ethnic history, there have always been two fundamentally different views of history, namely the historical materialism and the idealistic history. The former stands on the basis of the realistic history created by the people of all ethnic groups and interprets the objective historical development from the material practice. The latter, on the basis of understanding that the emperor will dominate the historical minorities by a few minorities, Thinking motivation or idea, to elaborate on the historical process, leading to distortion of the historical content. In the old history of nationalities, the crucial point of the feudal historical concept of the exploiting class, which dominated for a long time, lies in the following: taking the interests of the feudal dynasty as the transfer and observing and expounding the historical process of the relations between the ethnic groups and the ethnic groups, And national prejudice.