论文部分内容阅读
经过近几十年的发展,专利侵权中的等同原则在我国司法实践的运用中仍存在不少的问题。等同原则是该适用整体等同原则还是全部技术特征原则,等同的标准和时间,以及我国有众多的专利二审管辖法院的问题。通过对等同原则在美国的演进的探讨,探讨美国在适用等同原则时出现的问题和值得借鉴的经验,以期对我国在适用等同原则过程中遇到的问题提出解决方案和完善建议。
After several decades of development, the principle of equality in patent infringement still has many problems in the application of judicial practice in our country. The principle of equivalence applies to the principle of overall equivalence or the principle of all technical features, the same standards and time, and the problem that there are numerous second instance courts in our country. Through the discussion of the evolution of the principle of equivalence in the United States, this paper explores the problems that the United States has encountered in applying the principle of equivalence and its experiences worth learning from, in order to propose solutions and suggestions for the problems encountered in the application of the principle of equivalence in our country.