论文部分内容阅读
我们的批评有问题,这是一个谁都承认的事实,包括批评家本身吧。也许批评家认为评论的问题存在于原著……诸如此类,我认为,批评的问题存在于阅读。许多甚至太多批评家的阅读不够到位。我们来看看下面这些人是如何评论批评的,可以发现他们是如何阅读和理解的。纳博科夫评论果戈理,谈到《死魂灵》说道:要在《死魂灵》中寻找真正的俄国背景,就像根据浓雾中的艾尔西诺的那个小事件试图生成关于丹麦的概念一样徒劳。
There is a problem with our criticism. This is a fact that everyone admits, including the critics themselves. Maybe critics think the comment’s question exists in the original ... And so on, I think, the problem of criticism lies in reading. Many, if not many, critics do not read enough. Let’s look at how these people below criticize and find out how they read and understand. Nabokov commented on Gogol, referring to the “dead soul”, saying that looking for a real Russian background in Dead Soul would be like trying to generate a story about Danish The same concept of futility.