论文部分内容阅读
本文针对海德格尔关于胡塞尔与黑格尔“殊途同归”的论断,阐述一种新的“胡塞尔黑格尔异同论”。一方面,两者的主题(即绝对主体性)分别体现为被动性和主动性,因此辞同而实异;另一方面,两者除了在方法上存在着直观与思辨的差异之外,在主题和方法之关系方面也有重要区别,即胡塞尔的现象学方法揭示绝对主体性,但以此方法形成的认识不是这种主体性的完成,而黑格尔的辩证法不但揭示而且完成绝对主体性本身。因此,这两者之间有一种比“殊途同归”更为复杂的关系。
This article aims at Heidegger ’s thesis that Husserl and Hegel’ s “the same thing is different” and expounds a new “Husserl ’s Similarities and Differences”. On the one hand, the theme of the two (ie, absolute subjectivity) is embodied in both passiveness and initiative, so they are both identical and different. On the other hand, apart from the difference in visual and speculative methods, There are also important differences in the relationship between theme and method. Husserl’s phenomenological method reveals the absolute subjectivity, but the cognition formed by this method is not the completion of this subjectivity, and Hegel’s dialectics not only reveals and completes the absolute subject Sex itself. Therefore, there is a more complicated relationship between the two than the one with the same goal.