论文部分内容阅读
1 近年来,尽管人们纷纷运用“实践唯物主义”这一术语,但却不可回避地面临许多尚未解决或难以克服的难题。这里仅提及一二。困境之一:队伍的混杂检阅一下业已集合于“实践唯物主义”旗帜之下的队伍,就会发现,这里并未形成一个统一的哲学立场,其中至少包括三种相去甚远的哲学构想。一些人认为,“实践唯物主义”实质上就是“历史唯物主义的同义语”,就是“辩证唯物主义反映论”,它的根本理论前提仍是“物质本体论”或“物质一元论”(《哲学动态》,1988年第12期第16、13、26页)。而在另一端,有些(并非所有)“实践本体论”的倡导者把“实践本体论”归结为“实践的唯物主义的重要组成部分”(同上第35页)。介乎于上述二者之间的或许是典型的实践唯物主义。它一方面保留“外部自然界的优先地位”,另一方面强调劳动实践的基础地位;一方面肯定物质(自然)的本体地位,另一方面又把“劳动实
In recent years, although people have used the term “practical materialism”, they have unavoidably faced many unsolved or insurmountable problems. Mention here only one or two. One of the dilemmas: a mix of teams Reviewing teams that have been grouped under the banner of “Practical Materialism,” one finds that there is no unified philosophical position here, including at least three philosophical ideas that are far apart. Some people think that “practical materialism” is essentially “the synonym of historical materialism” and “the theory of dialectical materialism”. Its fundamental theoretical premises are still “material ontology” or “material monism” (“philosophy Dynamic ”, No. 12, 1988, pp. 16, 13 and 26). At the other end, some (but not all) advocates of “practical ontology” attribute “practical ontology” to “an important part of the practical materialism” (ibid., P. 35). Between the two may be between the typical practical materialism. On the one hand, it preserves “the priority of the outside world,” on the other hand, it emphasizes the basic position of labor practice; on the one hand, it affirms the material status of nature, on the other hand,