不当得利纠纷中证明责任的分配

• 作 者: 肖祥君 李顺前
• 机 构: 重庆市荣昌县人民法院,
• 出 处: 人民司法
• 发表日期: 2011年12期
• 关键词: 不当得利 证明责任 要件事实 裁判要旨 原告方 法律要件分类说 因果关系 待证事实 举证责任 支配权

【裁判要旨】在不当得利纠纷中,原告方(受损方)原则上要对一方得利、一方受损、得利与受损之间具有因果关系、得利无法律上的原因这4个要件事实承担证明责任。但在非因受损人行为所导致的非给付型不当得利中,得利无法律上的原因这一要件事实就成为一种实质意义上的消极事实,原告方将面临证明不能的困境;此时,应由得利方就其得利具有法律上的原因承担证明责任,才能彰显当事人之间的公平。

In the unjust enrichment dispute, the plaintiff (the injured party) should, in principle, benefit one party and the other party has a causal relationship between profitability and damage. There are no legal reasons for this. 4 The fact that a requirement bear the burden of proof. However, in the non-payment-type unjust enrichment resulting from the act of the damaged person, the fact that the profit is not caused by law has become a substantive negative fact and the plaintiffs will face the plight that can not be proved. At this point, the profit-making party should bear the burden of proof on the merits of its profit to demonstrate the fairness between the parties.