论文部分内容阅读
历史以怎样的方式被重现？它的准确性如何？弗兰普顿(K.Frampton)在《现代建筑——一部批判的历史》卷首中就提到“所有的历史都有无可例外地受到观察模式的限制,人们不可能写一部绝对的历史”。身处在不同历史阶段的理论家都会受到时代的影响,无法进行“绝对”评判。关于现代主义建筑运动(Modern Movement),从S.吉迪翁 (Sigfried Giedion)的《时间、空间和建筑》到塔夫里(Tafuri)的《现代建筑》,现代建筑运动的内容被不断扩充;运动中的正统性遭到不断的质疑:
How is history reproduced? How accurate is it? In his book “Modern Architecture - A Critical History”, K. Prampton mentions that “all history is inextricably bound by the observation mode, and one can not write an absolute history”. The theorists who are at different stages of history are influenced by the times and can not make “absolute” judgments. With regard to the Modern Movement of Modernism, the content of the modern architecture movement is constantly expanding from Sigfried Giedion's “Time, Space and Architecture” to Tafuri's “Modern Architecture” Orthodoxy in sports is constantly questioned: