论文部分内容阅读
《四川戏剧》编辑部为了解修撰《川剧志》的情况,使我有幸先拜读了何冶同志《漫评<川剧志>》一文。编辑部对理论争鸣积极提倡,这将有利于学术研究的正常开展。《漫评川剧志》一文(下简称“漫评”)对我们编辑出版的《川剧志》,提出了不少批评和问题。诸如《川剧志》的体例,框架结构是否合理,篇目设置、选例多少,以及他认为该如何写,写些什么等。其中心要害是批评《川剧志》违反了中国戏曲志的编纂原则。个人认为,一本书,一篇文章的出版或发表,能引起社会的
In order to understand the situation of the Sichuan Opera, Sichuan’s editorial department made me fortunate enough to read Comrade He Ye’s Commentary on Sichuan Opera. The editorial department actively advocates the argument of theory, which will be conducive to the normal development of academic research. The commentary on Sichuan Opera, a manuscript (hereinafter referred to as “Commentary”) on our edited and published “Sichuan Opera”, put forward a lot of criticism and problems. Such as “Sichuan Opera” style, frame structure is reasonable, set the number of items, how many options, as well as he thinks how to write, write something and so on. The central point of criticism is that “Sichuan Opera” violates the compilation principle of Chinese opera. Personally think that a book, an article published or published, can cause social