论文部分内容阅读
作为一种关于科学的哲学反思,伽达默尔诠释学显示出许多与英美科学哲学相似的兴趣和追求,“如何在科学时代重构超越客观主义和相对主义的健全理性”成为双方共同探究、参照思索的一大难题。通过对相对主义指责的辩驳、对精神科学独立性的论证以及对实践理性的复兴,伽达默尔试图从本体论上揭橥诠释学经验的普遍性。本文认为,伽达默尔对于方法论的轻视、对于启蒙精神的曲解、对于科学观念的成见以及对于实践理性的另辟蹊径,最终使得他认为科学与理性相分离、科学与真理相分离;但他的论证存在着诸多含糊、不充分甚至自相矛盾的地方。
As a philosophical reflection on science, Gadamer Hermeneutics shows many similar interests and pursuits with Anglo-S & T philosophy and “how to reconstruct sound rationality beyond objectivity and relativism in a scientific age” Explore, consider a big problem thinking. Through the rebuttal criticism of relativism, the demonstration of the independence of the spiritual science and the revival of practical rationality, Gadamer tries to unveil the universality of hermeneutic experience from ontology. This article argues that Gadamer’s contempt for methodology, misinterpretation of the spirit of enlightenment, preconceptions about the notion of science, and alternative ways of practicing rationality ultimately make him think that science and rationality are separated and that science and truth are separated; but his argument There are many ambiguities, inadequacies and even contradictions.