论文部分内容阅读
有幸拜读镇江市钱币学会会刊《梦溪泉苑》九六年第四期,该期刊以整版大篇幅刊登了《本期导读》和光中先生《警惕钱币研究中妄自尊大的现象》等有鲜明针对人倾向的文章.从表面上看,文章是抨击了“以甘肃酒泉林染泉友为典型代表”的“邪气”,但笔者认为这些文章会产生削弱中国钱币研究和学术讨论的力量的作用.《中国钱币学会章程》总则第三条指出;“以实事求是的科学态度,发扬学术民主,贯彻‘百花齐放,百家争鸣’和‘古为今用,洋为中用’的方针,开展各种学术活动,推进钱币学、货币史研究,为我国社会主义建设作出贡献.”基于此条,笔者认为林染先生在《安徽钱币》、《陕西金融》等刊物上发表的数篇商榷性文章中的措辞和语调,尚需改进和优化,但作为一个搞文学的同志能有如此敏锐的钱币认识和活跃的思维,难能可贵,因为如此热衷探讨钱币学问的人在若大个中国毕竟尚嫌太少了.笔者想讲几点;一、戴志强先生为《钱币学》一书撰文指出:“通过
Fortunate enough to read the Journal of Zhenjiang coin magazine “Dream Creek Springs Court,” the fourth issue of 1996, the magazine published a large full-page edition of the current reading and Mr. Guangzhong “vigilance coin study arrogance phenomenon” so distinct On the surface, the article lashed out on the “evil” of “representing Jiuquan Youquan in Gansu Province,” but I think these articles will have the effect of weakening the power of Chinese coinage research and academic discussion Article 3 of the General Rules of the Chinese Numismatic Institute states: “In the scientific attitude of seeking truth from facts, we should carry forward academic democracy and follow the guideline of” letting a hundred flowers blossom, a hundred schools of thought contend, “and” use the ancient as the present and the ocean as the middle, “and carry out various academic activities to promote coins Study and study of the history of money and make contributions to the socialist construction in our country. ”Based on this article, I think Mr. Lin’s wording and intonation in the several discarded essays published in publications such as“ Anhui Money ”and“ Shaanxi Finance ” Still need to be improved and optimized, but as a literary comrade can have such a keen coin understanding and active thinking, commendable, because so keen to explore money Money scholarship is not too large for China after all. I would like to talk about a few points. First, Mr. Dai Zhiqiang wrote an article entitled “The Study of Numismatics:” By