论文部分内容阅读
应当以《资本论》三卷为中心,厘清《资本论》逻辑、资本逻辑与物象化三者之间的深层关系。《资本论》逻辑是对资本逻辑的“再现”。《资本论》第一卷对资本逻辑进行了本质再现,而《资本论》三卷对资本逻辑进行了从本质到表象的总体再现。所谓资本逻辑其实就是资本主义生产方式的基本规律即价值增殖规律,其核心是劳动过程与价值增殖的二重性矛盾。《资本论》的核心逻辑是对资本逻辑的再现,而不是拜物教批判或物象化批判。资本逻辑是《资本论》的“主”逻辑,而物象化是《资本论》的“副”逻辑。资本逻辑是根源,而物象化是资本逻辑的效应:正是在资本逻辑从本质到表象转化生成的基础上,才发生了从本质到“物象”的颠倒表现关系。
The “capital theory” should be used as the center to clarify the deep relationship between the logic of “capital”, capital logic and materialization. The logic of capital is the “reproduction” of capital logic. The first volume of “Capitalism” essentially reproduces the logic of capital, while the third volume of Capital deals with the overall reproduction of the logic of capital from essence to representation. The so-called capital logic is actually the basic law of capitalist mode of production that is the law of value proliferation, the core of which is the dual contradiction between labor process and value proliferation. The core logic of Capital is the reproduction of capital logic, not fetishism or materialization. Capital logic is the “master” logic of “capitalism,” and materialization is the “vice” logic of “capitalism.” Capital logic is the root cause, and materialization is the logic of capital. It is precisely from the nature of the logic of the capital to generate the basis of the formation, only from the essence of the “image ” upside down relationship.