论文部分内容阅读
司法公正是法治的生命线,公正是司法的生命和灵魂。当今中国的法治化建设,尤为重要的是司法公正的推进。推进依法治国,司法公正是保障。但司法机关在面对一个案件时,却很难把握公正的内涵;司法机关游曳于各种价值观之间,在一个案件中如何做出可接受性较高的司法判决已经成为一个公认的难题。在司法判决中,我们是应该遵循法律还是民意?我们的遵循是机械的还是能动的?我们对于司法判决可接受性的评判是立足于什么?近些年来,邓玉娇案、许霆案等都显示出司法判决可接受程度的问题,这些案件产生的判决对于司法有积极的也有消极的作用;本文试图从法律的角度来分析司法判决的可接受性,力图找出较为适宜的方式来提高司法判决的可接受性。
Justice is the lifeline of the rule of law. Justice is the life and soul of justice. At present, the legalization of China is particularly important for the promotion of judicial fairness. To promote governing the country according to law, judicial justice is the guarantee. However, it is very difficult for the judiciary to grasp the fair connotation in the face of one case. It is a recognized problem that the judiciary is swam between various values and how to make a more acceptable judicial decision in one case . In judicial decisions, we should follow the law or public opinion? Our compliance is mechanical or dynamic? Our judgments on the acceptability of judgments based on what? In recent years, Deng Yujiao case, Xu Ting case, etc. have shown Judgments of the degree of acceptability, the judgments produced in these cases have a positive and negative effect on the judiciary; This article attempts to analyze the acceptability of judicial judgments from the legal point of view, trying to find out more appropriate ways to improve judicial decisions Acceptability.