论文部分内容阅读
最近,《揭开“华人与狗不得入内”流传之谜》一文,在海内外引起一场不小的风波。此文以“揭秘”为名,提出“华人与狗不得入内”的事实缺乏根据,或者讲根本没有根据,是“中国人的劣根性”云云。奇文一出,国人哗然,许多读者和文史专家以自己亲眼目睹的事实及大量确凿可信的档案史实,证明这块有辱国人的牌子确实存在过,对《揭》文作者轻率抹煞和曲解历史事实的作法,理所当然地提出了批评。 这使我想起了另一篇以“揭秘”为名的奇文《论柳直荀死因之大白》。作者在文中提到《毛主席诗词·蝶恋花)中,“我失骄杨君失柳”的柳直荀同志,说“据最近消息,终于从陈年的档案材料里头,找到了确凿的
Recently, “Unraveling” Chinese and dogs are not allowed to enter the “mystery of the spread,” a text that has caused no small disturbance at home and abroad. The article “Secret” in the name of “Chinese and dogs shall not be admitted to” the lack of basis for the facts, or no basis at all, is “the Chinese bad roots” and so on. Inspired by the essay, many readers, literary and historical experts have witnessed the fact and a large amount of credible and credible archives and have proved that this brand of degrading nationality does exist and has been neglected and misinterpreted by the author Historical facts, of course, put forward criticism. This reminds me of another essay in the name of “Secret” in the “On the causes of death of Liu Zhizun”. The author mentioned in the text “Chairman Mao poetry butterflies love flowers”, “I am despised Yang Jun Liu” comrades, said "According to recent news, and finally from the aged files inside, found a conclusive