论文部分内容阅读
目的 :对比分析腹腔镜与开腹手术在治疗宫外孕中的临床疗效。方法 :在我院收治的宫外孕患者中随机选取90例患者,并采用随机分组的方式将患者分为对照组45例和观察组45例,采用传统的开腹手术对对照组患者进行治疗,采用腹腔镜手术对观察组患者进行治疗,将两组的相关临床指标进行对比,分析临床疗效。结果 :在术中指标的比较中,观察组的术中平均出血量以及手术时间均明显低于对照组,差异显著(P<0.05);在术后观察指标的比较中,观察组的尿管留置时间、住院天数以及术后腹痛时间均明显优于对照组,两组间比较存在显著差异性(P<0.05)。结论 :在宫外孕患者的临床治疗中,采用腹腔镜手术治疗的效果显著优于传统的开腹手术,具有较高的安全性,该治疗方法值得临床推广与使用。
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Methods: Ninety patients were selected randomly from our hospital for ectopic pregnancy. The patients were divided into control group (n = 45) and observation group (n = 45) by random grouping. Patients in control group were treated by traditional laparotomy. Laparoscopic surgery patients in the observation group were treated, the two groups of related clinical indicators were compared to analyze the clinical efficacy. Results: The intraoperative blood loss and operation time were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group (P <0.05). In the comparison of postoperative observation indicators, the observation group’s catheter The duration of stay, length of hospital stay and postoperative abdominal pain were significantly better than those of the control group, with significant differences between the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion: In the clinical treatment of patients with ectopic pregnancy, the effect of laparoscopic surgery was significantly better than the traditional open surgery, with high safety, the treatment is worthy of clinical promotion and use.