论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨Dixon保肛术与Miles术治疗直肠癌的方法及疗效对比。方法:将2009年3月～2012年8月我科收入的76例直肠癌患者随机分为对照组、观察组,分别给予Dixon保肛术、Miles术治疗,记录并作回顾性分析。结果:观察组在手术时间、排便次数、肛门狭窄及吻合口瘘等方面小于对照组且具有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:Dixon保肛术临床疗效优于Miles术,尤其可以显著改善患者排便情况,提高生存质量,减少并发症发生率。
Objective: To investigate the methods and efficacy of Dixon sphincter preservation and Miles operation in the treatment of rectal cancer. Methods: A total of 76 rectal cancer patients from March 2009 to August 2012 were randomly divided into control group and observation group. The patients were treated with Dixon sphincter preservation and Miles operation. The data were recorded and analyzed retrospectively. Results: The observation group was smaller than the control group in operation time, defecation frequency, anal stenosis and anastomotic fistula (P <0.05). Conclusion: The clinical efficacy of Dixon anal sphincter preservation is superior to Miles surgery. In particular, Dixon can significantly improve defecation, improve quality of life and reduce the incidence of complications.